Post-Pyth

Speaking of headings and lede or ships,

it was not that Greek to me,

other than Pythagoras and the pre-calculus of culture. 
In that *vane* or *weather* the GPS is communcating,
here are some points:

We're in Trouble: Salon / Gore
The Drone Weasels : Slate / Saletan
Secrecy Corrodes Democracy: Consortium News / Parry

While I have not fully read these, I have previously deployed their headlines or sorts *ofor* paraphrases.  Not that they aren't capable of mis-ledes or weasels or being Greek to any of us. 

E-Merging from this? 
It is not just about bending the law but the processes[*] that bend the law. 

[Owe/OW] (fn)

*bracketeds* = pun, [!] or (sic).
[*] late M-bed ? ['n-Oh-particular order!]

2-12-13 Please NOTE My comment below this post,
 Re: PC** and 4 moolahs / mediums.[and 4ms] WU who! [!] ? [speaking of *blank*volutions ! ('n bs)]

Update: LEGEND PAGE, (FC), Updates.

** caution see LEGEND and *aster*risks[!]
i.e. Re:Political Calculus *&* cultured dishes and dashes (O _ U _ C _ H ?)

Finally Two!

What's all the hullabaloo?

[C-legend need to update.]
A legend is a map of sorts, to a map.
Example:  NFR = not fully read
[!] = (sic) read as intended, pun, irony, sarcasm NFB, not fully blue[!]
or tangents

New York Times

Safire Search Context,
Editor or New Job Opening For Balance.
[Sent to New York Times 10-17-03.]

In "Dean’s ‘Urban Legend’", there he goes again. Letters to the Editor are allowed 150 words, but William Safire cannot make his case in his allotted space. Safire is proved the "urban legend" monger. No Will Rogers or Shakespeare, he is much ado about nothing but hypocrisy.

It takes more to put in context what lacks it. He has misread Dean’s argument and dismissed those who put it in context as partisan and "blow(ing) smoke" of a philosophical nature. I don’t know which he disrespects more, context, partisanship or philosophy but he certainly must have inhaled to mistake his hypocrisy for context.

After addressing this in a longer piece I did an MSN search [William Safire, Dean] to find in 3rd click a substantive rebuttal of Safire’s misconstruction and refabrication for those who want facts. In 4th is his philosophical partisan absurdity I will have to put in context later.

[update: 1-29-09 editing and click or more this post found itself on page two of search]
[1-30-09 "substantial rebuttal" and "partisan absurdity" may have changed their clicks, but context was incremental here.]
[Finally clearing up a bit of past posts, I poked the lily pad of the lying pond and find #6 to disagree with. To be honest, I don't always completely read the footnotes or links I attach.]

Safire Proved Urban Legend Monger

and Scandalous Hypocrite
[Sent to King County Journal 10-16-03.]

There he goes again. I would probably cancel my subscription if not for the need for something to raise my low blood pressure and an occasional laugh. I’m talking about William Safire and his misconstruction and re-fabrication of the truth in "Dean claims ‘urban legend,’ but he really said it". One could accuse him of out right lying if not it being much-ado about nothing, much as the Dean / McCain dispute which he attempts to straighten out.

He reasonably if not confusingly (and in this case it is another matter if accurately) explains the issue but then goes on to blame an understanding of it on partisanship and then participates in the same hogwash. There is probably not enough room in a letter to the editor to rehash the issue, but a reread of the Safire piece does nothing to substantiate his charge (if there is one) and proves there is more journalism in many cartoons.

After writing this I did an MSN Search [William Safire, Dean] and found a substantive rebuttal running in third for those who want facts*, which leads me to conclude Will Safire is no Shakespeare though he may feel like one. For he is much ado about nothing but scandalous hypocrisy. Further evidenced by what runs fourth in this search: "lying in ponds", by William Safire, a study of partisanship I will spare for later. But look to the section he titled Philosophy, a word he equated with "blow(ing) smoke"** when referring to Dean.

* fact is these updates [1-29-09] to links and heading places search findings in different orders, and I can only imagine that this is the link.

** or as close enough for government(or pundit) work: "They will blow smoke about Dean offering a philosophical observation entirely detached from the rapists who were the subject of the question. Some partisans would buy that." And some apparently sell it.

FOOTNOTES PAGE 3 NOVEMBER 2013

equals ate[!] [posted 11-21-13]
Uncertain whether to spoiler alert, D'ribble or further FP, but...
anarchy rubs me the wrong way.  This is my un-Mbedding.  Scroll over heading and each link for legend airy hints. 
My point is, I guess(spoiler alert), that having another perspective does not mean that ether(sic) has a right angle[!]

Not 2...

round up [!] *

* bold read

(Pardon the construction, and legend lagging.  Bold indicates actually read.) 

WP: UN Gaza War Crimes
WP:  Abandoning Globalization
Time:  Charleston Terrorism

(b.s.) bold+read *
(fb/Time)
(bold+s.+c.) a, b, C. Calm Pend E Um  , D. Realmiffication , E. HELP NAVIGATION .
(share+'n+angle+read)a, b, C. File of sorts.

(You scroll/click & see right column for Pages/Archives)

[Ron Paul v Fed(~)Obama w/ Marc Maron]
{Not to pun on too.} 
[pitch, putt, punt]

Legend Airy

--HIMYM*``
-






* pop culture
` sub prime/ or prime one
- OK, it's a stretch. 
Not to be Pol(lish)[!]


w.c. fields/m.c./e.b.:  words count/world coalition/water closet




9-11-14
[It is hard to get gung ho about a moderated~ response.  Although one side may want^ more, another may think it^ more of the same.  I will make a concerted effort to D-lineate (o'R lineate)?]


^ to reid aumf ~ to vote or not to vote / chew congress and run at the same time.

Work in Progress

Pardon my Polish, let alone French.


The Thomas Gil affair.(Winkowski/Kerlikowske)
Noam Comski
Prior two ski(e)s.


(7-14-14) Original Heading "Poll R Express"(7-14-95 m-bed)


7-25-14  Revamp Devenn?
Under the Table?, Re/venn, irony, Tetra Heed Ron , heed / run, USC, legend,
Egg/Road/Sky* , Fight On


loss confirmed The Cycle/NOW
Confidence[?][!]... Ctrl F "if"@Go Jump in the Lakoff[!]

Descartes Be4 D...

...hoRsemen.

i.e.^ // e.g.



^ not for vulnerable ears (i.e. he says the ePH word and more)*

* a tangent for vulnerables minds? (i.e. different ePH words)
~
Wait, I just may have fallen into a legend trap***, ergo Decartes grid-Locke[?]
Anyway, this 3-Minute Philosophy on St. Thomas Aquinas to my listening three times, did not have the -uck word, but might still be awkward to some. 
OW < Hitchens in Mill's coffee shop. 
~

ergo:  Link 1, Decartes wiki, 2, grammar-monster 3. R-rated 3mPh "Decartes"  4. B.S. on E. G.
*1. PG-rated 3mPh "Aquinas" 2. G-rated YouTube "Mill" 3. :-) -rated YouTube "Mill" 3. P/un-rated YouTube** [i.e. = "another words", e.g. = "for example, ergo?]

** inserted link on hold.(The pun was a Wolf in Hitchens form)
e.g.  /  i.e. ~ er / go ? (I am missing a figure(guy) to be found later.)  NOT! Yet C-PC!

***
/ ->Pink Floyd
/ ->A Tale of Two Manicheans.
Cultural Threads are Fine.

Know B.S ? ! Evangelii Gaudium !

Weigh In or Way Out?

This is just to note that I have not weighed in on Cheney's Putter, the Golf War Dis-aster(sp!). Nor might* I way out on the recent SCOTUS nomination.

* Normite(sp!) not applicable, but I have aster risked the hints...not exactly.

[We've come a long way Katy! Pardon the innuendo**, but from Oil welfare rich Alaska to VP candidate to BP and back, I mean really... ]

** seriously I allude to the three women from politician to journalist and potential jurist, but there is caveat of commity* in word play.) (Is there a commity* network?)

[No! I did not know that.] Hint: Johnny or Jay Walker?] SNL?

[update: Not exactly! Tangent or See Can't or just Penn Station?

*[5-17-10] spell check (sp?!) legend: as intended? OK! In this case, alright.
In other cases (sp!) as intended, (sp!?) maybe more than one intention?
aka: no pun intended, or was there? This is a long narrative to say I don't intend to correct the unintended misspell, as in other minds it may mean something. But my intention was to insert the caveat channel.

vOO due: vCR



It's math. In progress.



I have input this date from Think Progess chart.


I won't deWonk, reWonk or futher Wonk, but it might need review.
Translation/legend:  vOO versus Original Obama(budget)
vCR versus Continuing Resolution

[My MSExcel is a rework of Think Progess chart, for thinking sake, as if a visual scan is not enough.]
[I will reviey my cell formulaes but one can alway redo that math.]

So if I may risk putting this into words:

The Senate CR is 18.04% below the Original Obama (budget) that is a compromise. The CR is 1.93% over Ryan's Budget. Is that enough to tell the story of compromise? 

But the (original)Senate Budget was a already 12.05% below OO, which is .(point)66% below the CR. Owe the irony of math and read lines (or shifting bottom lines).  The so-called compromise(CR) is $8 billion over the Senate Budget, $72 billion below the Obama Budget, and $29 billion below the Original Ryan Budget, keeping in mind the general direction of intent.  But grand math wise the Senate CR is $19 billion over Ryan's Budget which I think was compromised(reduced) $128 billion from his original, while the the Senate CR is $217 billion below Obama's Original and $199 billion below actual 2010.  Now that is leverage ... or math. 

Compromise whining aside, CALL FOR A VOTE!

Penn State Disaster

First and foremost is the disaster for the victims. [Disturbing descriptions are contained in these links.] Too much may have been made about the effect on a football legend and educational institution but both have been indicted by the apparent pressure of fame and market forces. Not to lay all the blame on Coach Joe Paterno, he apparently was not legally indicted. Not to make light of any seriousness in this tragedy, but was it appropriate that they allowed Paterno to hang on for football win 409?

Checking In:

The Nation's New 4mat? Yeah, that's the ticket!
Tangent? Or see can't, or inverse of a co-sign?* Even a google of Charle Pride** found same.

* pardon my trig, it was "water cooler" sourced.

** A metaphor for America, diplomacy and justice

[In balance not necessarily a relationship. The particulars are different but is seems that there is a two for one[***] style, Obama if you will, that works in different system. There are dimensional differences in the branches and partisanship of the way we have evolved from the British, that ironically may be 4shadowed in theTea Party/Brown wavering.]

*** sound words that do not necessarily cross the Red C or Atlantic. The more dimensions? The Paul/Sanders Fed Audit Bill, the Palin/Paul Tea Party gap, the Democrat/Liberal dialogue 4knot?
[see update: 5-17-10 Legend Label introduced with Comity expanded labeling. But see Ribble ** I was noting that Pride and Rich find the same tune under a google.]

FOOTNOTES PAGE two SEPTEMBER 2014

Nexus (OT) 9-5-14 (sc){L}
C-heading, labels; but in this case (Original Title), Link@date, (scroll click),{legend}
1. read is ed? (pseudo-mop[?]) Post
2. (b.s.) Pop+yogurt: (fp1,2/13),(fp1,1/13),Pop Yogurt[!],  Optimism*, Now this is the ticket.
*find anachronism link m-bed ed (just moments ago, somewhere above)? Hint: under-6

Reading List(UC)

Actually Read!
Proof of Heaven  4-20-13
...to be filled in...
Contact (sometime Fall '95)^^^
Not to book mark or end.[f1]^
(Nor to contrast "to read" or "having read".)

^rough footnote #1  (b.s. )twain+meet* (or list: swift + craft )
*(s c )^^
^^review scroll click legend/links
[f2] first link Not two reeds(b.s.) Theory, Left Behind, Punderous Ponderings
[f3] / "gadfly" ?

(4-22-13 ^^^ )PG? Post Graduate [Boston Strong]
(Not to F-Bomb)
PAGE UNDER CONSTRUCTION

4-24-13 The date may be telling. (pre-post or us? 4/21/13 1:15 PM)
Actually two reads, read & Posted 4/24/13 3:20PM
Ironically: we half two have too ? [!] [?] ...

(fn)TOO Point OH[!]

FOOTNOTE PAGE TWO: January 2013
note placement date v. time stamp
(bold and unbold)
1-3-13 that is the quest : place holder 4 (sc), BLANK NETWORK(sc), Who got the memo?(sc),  Educat or,  New York Times(sc), Safire Proved Urban Legend Monger(sc)
HECUVA TANGENT

1-3-13  Spare Me (SC): (b.s.) "Tales" of sorts[^] :
Re: Leads(?), A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the News Stand , Not to make light... (), Niche for our Nietzsche() , Tails Aside (), The Real Deal() , Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications. (sc) (7?)

1-7-13 Foot in mouth?   Means Trumps Meaning, but can't read memos. , Try-Mentionalism ?[!] , Snooki? , "a royal huff" , The Alter of Tax Cuts ?

1-11-13  SNAP (sic) i.e. [!] or spell check double check AKA unintended CAD? Root cause?  CapTenseLog[!] running in draft.

1-14-13   nor  link or punt?
Waking up to a New Year.  //  Ghost of X-mas Passed. , The other ground game...

1-16-13 [1] off law and lalaland?

Memories...or Excusing Pre-quashing (sc) the FeeNix? , "buying a stairway"  , Oh Sasha! , Running Joke

 

NPR [!]

 

 

 

 



A Tail of Caution

Not that I intend to wag the dog,
but doggin' the wags? (fn)

I will let U SC [!]**

On a more mundane line, or mudlane^ nine...
I reference the "hack list" per se not the characters or authors. *

Bazinga!  It's a culture thing !
Knot so Random Guy!

How'zabout Smith Zoning Limits?
ven under draft: (Hobbes~Locke~Newton~Liebniz~  ?Swift)

My mocumentary* was not intent on this Web of Charlotte or EB' n flo ...
I stepped in it. ^

"Never let...
 

...a good caption go to Hegel?
a good crisis go to waste."

* "~"
^  '~'
 ~   = alternate reference/legend 2b evolved
i.e. anachronistic or non linear notations.

**/(fn) irony:
(1) deja vu?  
(2)  alter wing?
(3) alter hacks
(4) nature calls? (FP)

Wait for it...

Legend...
Trump Poised to Shake Up GOP Debates*
...airy?

Racist attack on Trump by Howard Fineman?    
"...rampaging through a field of pymies..."

* I would call it the DWTS demograhic or polling effect. 
 

4MAT Shift?

Hyper-Dig?^

~ of 6 links)
Spoiler alert: ala FP? Or legend of sorts...
The (#'s) below are the sequence of inserting above.
The M-beds within are links to blog searches of this blog.**

(4.) April 23rd, Openly Secular Day!
(1.) The Labor Market Conundrum: The Cyclical And The Secular
(2.) What Would Don Draper Do? Reading Dante in a Secular Age
(5.) Document Proclaims Secular Government
(6.) Mullahs and Heretics [!]
(3.) The Godless Delusion*

* Bingo: Started Reading!
** these italics are bibliographing in progress

Cyclical A. F'N Too Point Oh[!], B. Proof of Life..., C. In "F"n able?, D. Politics is local?, E. Rubber/Glue "Unhinged".
Reading A. A counting Trick? , B. Long Story
Document A. escapement?, B. Absolut(ist)ly..., C. Temporal, D. Two Birds
and A. Reality is the 4D., B. The dig?*** , C. Better Business Bureau
[!] A. Being a Blank "is Hard Work".
delusion A. TIP OF THE FLAME , B. But for Angle , C. Phase II?

*** anomaly of (sc)

Cyclical B:art ~ Rib~L [*~*]

^ 3-26-15
The Dig ? 2b Kantinued ?
1,2,
5, The Vox: Cruz Control?
3,4,
6. Progressive Values: Ctrl F Reich

FOOTNOTE PAGE FOUR

2-12-13 See*FP3*: ^
(b.s.) "stay+course" Who Are They Calling Elitist?, It's Obama's Turn, Spare the Rodney!, PHASE II: We need some movement! , FP?  Stay the Comity of Course , Are We "IN" Yet?, Stay the Comity* What's going on? , I'm not a lawyer but..., Out of Line? "Hogwash", *knot*, ...what about the damage to your Presidency?,  The other ground game..., Tony Baloney, Rest in Peace: Andrew Breitbart , Off the Cuff?, GO OBAMA!*(note2) Weeeee! or Fb?

(b.s.) "navigate"  Fine Tuning. OW2*3, Borrowed Comment!, All Politics is Local? , Try Angle,C-weeeee*, I Told You So.yeah(sc)right, Two Clever by One Third? , ABA Retracts "Lawyer" of the Years, Unity '08 (pOW), Local Content , LeftyBlog? , Once, Twice, Three Times A Charm, **

Note: problematic to LABEL at this time.[[?]] [^^] 
* (sc) [F&progress?]or *knot*
** note on progress in regard to this blog 'n case studies re:CAD) (fn)

(fn) TBA? CAD (Culturally Aided Design), CAD (2 out of 3 be bad), CAD (To be or not 3d), State of Politics, "you people..."? 

^ see more than one level of problematic aster risking and design.  Which should be revisited from the top line down, with focus on Labels, all annotations marks, PAGES and *FN* heading, and TBA laters.

[^^] 2-13-13 [Do I have to return to *legend*
[!] = pun, satire, etc.  [[?]] could mean later question mark inserted. Of course most puns are a matter of timing and sometime anachronistic.  
BUT BACK TO TODAY'S (FP4) Here: Not that I intended to hit(A.) on (B.) the anachronism.
(b.s.) "articulated+bus"= A. NO JOKE , B. UPDATE ONLY? KNOT[!]  [**] {L}